Why do we need a marketplace within our Personalisation programme?
Most Local Authority Care is currently provided in a top-down model. The Council purchase a block contract of, say, 100,000 home visits this year. Those visits are then allocated in the most efficient way for the Provider/Commissioner. Typically, a Resource Allocation System or Workforce Scheduling tool is used for the task. This can result in a client getting lunch at 10.00am from a worker who they’ve never met before.
A marketplace is the mechanism by which (a) providers offer their services (b) Service Users decide what to purchase. It is driven from the bottom up. Providers have to organise delivery around buyers' demands, not their own priorities.
We’re offering Service Users a choice of Providers they can phone, isn’t that a market?
It is. But it’s doing little to improve on block contracts. As the Service User, I’m probably not engaged by a list of companies who want to sell me a service. My interest is in the person who will be providing the Support. Do I trust them? How long have I known them? Do we have a rapport? That’s far more important than who is pay-rolling the individual.
Many Service Users will want to continue with familiar models of Care and are happy with a particular Provider organisation. They have the least need for a true marketplace. But others need flexible Support to plug the gaps between informal Care or want more control for other reasons. They are the ones who need more than a list of suppliers. They could be as little as 5% of your clients, but they are likely to be the ones that create the most problems if they are expected to contact multiple Providers in search of their needs.
We’re already planning software as the backbone of our Personalisation drive. Do we need a Person-to-Person marketplace?